“To rely on coercion to achieve progress is like relying on bulldozers and steamrollers for routine transit.” – Jim Bovard
Getting the Lay of the Land—please read before signing up or commenting
Bear 
Cat Farmer 
Endervidual 
Jorge 
Lobo 
Mama Liberty 
NonEntity ![]()
Polka ![]()
Skeptical Man 
The Shadow 
The White Russian 
About Sunni 
Ask An Anarchist guidelines
Time Is Money (not): essay by NonEntity
H.A.D.: short story by Shaun Saunders
The Seven C’s: short story by Shaun Saunders
What If They Want Beer for Breakfast? by Jorge
Life in the Slow Lane by Jorge
Patents by Jorge
Personal Technology by Jorge
My First Drug by Sunni
Sunni’s Essays
Montag
Enjoy Every Sandwich
The Quill
one small voice
Yak Attack
Kent’s “Hooligan Libertarian” Blog
NoState.com
No Third Solution
The Picket Line
Disloyal Opposition
Classically Liberal
Wendy McElroy
Out of Step
to herd or not to herd
Presto’s Ramblings
Lunaya Pravda
The Rosarita Beach Café
P.A.W.E. Hairy Mountain Man
Murphy’s Bye-Laws
Liberty and Culture
Uncivil Defence
Happy Curmudgeon
Pagan Vigil
Social Memory Complex
Colliding Softly with the World of Ideas
Brad Spangler
FSK’s Guide to Reality
Wirkman Netizen
The Zone
A Pox on All Their Houses
Mutualist Blog
Bovard
Rants and Raves
J. Orlin Grabbe
Market Theocracy
The Freedom Outlaw
Woolyboogers
Independent Country
The War on Guns
Chris Sciabarra’s “Not a Blog”
Knappster
The Time Sink
L. Neil Smith at Random
H. Ben’s Blog
Final Cut
Vera Verba blog
Self-Sufficiency in Style
John Taylor Gatto
Fully Informed Jury Association
Alliance of the Libertarian Left
Albert Einstein Institution
The Loose Cannon Libertarian
Plug Nickel Times
New Hampshire Underground
Vera Verba store
The Voluntaryist
The Freedom Library
Illegal Art
Slyck
Carl Bussjaeger
Lost Horizons
Stupid Security
Orwell Today
The Thoreau Reader
Anarchy in Your Head cartoons
Take Liberty
Also see my Webby Wanderings
Jesse’s Café Américain
AntipodeanSF
XKCD
Physorg
Discordian Research Technology
Technopagan Yearnings
Attracting Abundance
Mastering EFT
Innersource
Energy psychology research & resources
Repairman Jack forum
RV Unfriendly
LifeSharers
SimpleCare
EurekAlert
Monolithic Dome Institute
Tumbleweed Tiny Houses
Sensitive Light

Funny Prophet
"Fun" is perhaps entirely a subjective phenomena: our perception of it is certainly highly subjective, and it is difficult to point to an objective standard that our perception reflects. One who acquires sufficient self-control can have "fun" doing anything (even profitable things!). Because of the ease with which we can bend our perception of fun, and the difficulty in keeping this feeling aligned with anything outside ourselves, "fun" is generally a terrible star by which to steer. Those who attempt it often seem to end up chasing their tails: and I have fun watching them.
"Profit", on the other hand, is an objective standard, so it is possible to keep our perceptions of it aligned with reality. It is not quite as easy as, say, temperature: where we can stay calibrated by hauling a simple instrument around. It is often more difficult to predict the outcome of a particular transaction: building up the fire is a reliable way to increase the temperature in our house, but investing our resources so as to reliably make a profit is more difficult. There is a lot of random noise to obscure the issue: "I won the lottery! See, lottery tickets were a great investment after all!". The timescale upon which profit operates can be longer than we can perceive. To further confuse the issue, humans have dual natures, and what can profit one side will often cause a loss for the other: necessitating some hard choices at times. Still, despite these difficulties, over the long haul "profit" is a star that will guide us consistently if we mind it.
Of course, a person can always chose to ignore the objective nature of profit, and warp their perception of "profit" in any way they please. If they blow their day playing in the sun, they can tell themselves that really this was quite profitable in some way perceptible only to them. They might even convince themselves that their naval lint was as valuable as gold, and start hoarding it in jars.
I'm not sure that warping our perceptions is really a wise thing to do: but it seems a lot safer to convince oneself that what is profitable is fun, than the other way around.
As a final note: the fact that we can quote people we have never met, like Jones; and people long dead, like Thoreau: suggests strongly that they were guided by the star of profit.