I agree, to a point

It is probably smarter to be skeptical of alternative "sounds to good to be true" theories. Pursue them if you wish, but with your eyes open and in "condition orange".

Just because science scoffs at something doesn't mean it has no validity, but scientific evaluation is not the professional's task alone. It is also something you can do on a case by case, day to day, basis. Thereby protecting yourself.

Reply

The content of this field is kept private and will not be shown publicly.