Some additional comments I originally posted as a PM, which add to Sunni's last post.

I need to make something clear: we are at a point in time now in the evolution of human thought (change a mind; change a life) when we must be especially diligent in using words that hold their meaning.

The concept of the jury is one that needs to be approached positively not only for today, but also for tomorrow, so that as many individuals as possible are aware that juries are a good, and can operate for justice and fairness, reason and logic, long after the state is gone.

The more we can do to provide everyone with assurances that humans can survive and thrive without the state, the better we are assisting in the introduction of the new paradigm.

I think it is especially important now, as governments around the planet slide further down the slope of tyrannical socialism and its dependence on force, to offer thinking individuals a choice in how they live, and also show them the good in rationally choosing to live as self-responsible individuals.

One of the contemporary opportunities to practice self-responsibility is available to all who serve as jurors. Effecting a change in the thinking of another individual to the extent that the individual comprehends their function of the juror is often a liberating epiphany for that person.
IMJ