I'm against this new ruling of SCOTUS, yet I feel that the LLH folks are actually helping to support this new ruling via their actions.
The way bad laws are legitimized is through example, and what better example can SCOTUS shake in front of "the people" than one of their own being the FIRST to "willingly, publicly, and with much publicity" give up their own private property for the sake of enriching the coffers of that local government.
If perchance SOUTER were to willingly accept far less than market value for this property, then some later ruling given "the SOUTER precedence" could easily allow property to be confiscated at far under market value in the name of nationalism/patriotism.

Is this what we want?