It Can't be True ... Can It?

Sunni's picture
| |

Okay, with a few exceptions, I’ve spent much of my day trying to get my Kubuntu install working the way I’d like. The primary challenge remaining (as far as I know right now) is to get PGP working.

And in trying to get it working, an embarrassing, dispiriting thought came to me ... what if I’m a luser who isn’t capable of handling being outside the proprietary corral?

I’m trying not to be clueless, but it’s frustrating to track down clues when a system’s behavior changes unpredictably. For example, multiple Linux users recommended installing Gnome alongside the KDE that’s built into Kubuntu, because some of the stuff in Gnome is better than some of the stuff in KDE. I’d used Gnome before, years ago under Red Hat, and that seemed reasonable. So I did that on the original drive, and didn’t have any known problems with it. Today, I did it again, on the new hard drive, and upon restarting I learned that Gnome had promoted itself to the default window manager! That wouldn’t’ve been so bad if it had been a more familiar GUI, but it’s very different from my last experience. It took about an hour to extricate myself from that mess, and I’m still wanting to find a way to keep that from happening again.

Part of it has to do with MAL, too ... I think I’ve come to rely on him more than is good. In fact, I said something to that effect, and while he acknowledged it, he added that he enjoys (mostly) solving problems and playing with code, and that he usually can accomplish results faster than I can. And since my machine is vital to almost all my work, faster is definitely better. So I’m not sure how to find a better balance here. But one does need to be reached.

Relax..

This is just a little bump in the road. It sounds like you might have done something different between the two installs...Perhaps you installed Ubuntu-Desktop vs. default Gnome or vice-versa? Ubuntu reconfigures the default Gnome interface to something that they think is better. The problem is that the two are different enough to be confusing.

As far as getting help goes, there is definitely nothing wrong with that, just make sure that you fully understand what he did when he is finished, or as soon as possible thereafter. That way you won't have to ask twice for the same problem.

One thing to remember is that you can easily run Gnome apps in KDE and vice-versa. I used Gnome originally, but found that I used so many KDE apps that I switched to KDE and found that I preferred it. I still prefer some Gnome apps, though. Firefox, Totem, Audacity, and Synaptic come to mind. I also may switch back to the Eye of Gnome image viewer. But I do not have the Gnome (default or Ubuntu) desktop installed. My hard drive's really small, and I need the room.

Corrals, proprietary or otherwise

I suppose Galambos and some others might disagree, but nothing about its proprietary nature makes Windows attractive to me; mainly because I don't own it, someone else does.

Because of its free and open nature, the choices available with Linux make it more varied and therefore also more flexible. Although many people have built Windows applications not as many alternate desktops for Windows exist as Windows applications. GNOME and KDE may rank as the most popular desktops for Linux, but plenty of others exist.

It seems to me that Presto has given some good advice. I prefer KDE for several reasons, perhaps most because it does not seem to hide configuration from me. On the other hand GNOME seems to be headed toward something like a "registry" idea. If that's what someone wants, then they will have that under Linux. I'm all for people having what they want, so long as I don't have to pay for it. In an open market like Linux I won't.

I've also added Firefox to KDE. I turned off the GNOME file interface and took the standard Mozilla file interface. I also use GIMP on the KDE machine, but I haven't looked at the new Krita yet. I've heard good things about Totem, but I really like Amarok a lot. I have not fooled around with Kaffeine much yet though. Audacity sounds interesting, but I haven't done any sound editing yet, either; though I do have an interest in it from long ago and the age of tapes. Adept suits me, but I'll probably spend more time trying to get a better grasp on DPKG and its friends.

I believe the greatest power of a corral for the rancher comes from its setting of an artificial boundary. That intrusion into a "natural setting" can intimidate. However, the more I know about my surroundings, generally the more confident I feel. Familiarity helps build that confidence. On the other hand, if someone else owns those surroundings they could change without notice. If I control those surroundings that shouldn't happen. Of course, like with most things, perfection in software seems unlikely with any system.

When I was younger and rented I didn't like the idea of making improvements in someone else's property, while making improvements in my own property seems limited only by getting the time to do it. That's how I feel about Windows and Linux. Using Windows seems like renting, while running Linux feels more like having a real home. Of course, having a home has its complications too.

Thank you, gents

Your thoughts are very helpful, and much appreciated.