VeriChip Wants to Spychip Alzheimer’s Patients

Sunni's picture
| | |

It’s happening just as my friend Shaun Saunders wrote in Mallcity 14. In this excerpt, Jack is explaining how the chipping of humans began:

“... the government of twenty-five years ago exploited something else, an emotion just as strong if not more powerful. As Mary said, that emotion was fear. To recap, banks wanted to know where you spent all of your money, and the governments they controlled wanted to know where you were, always. To achieve these aims all they had to do was to replace the ID cards with the subcutaneous chips. After all, even if we were to transfer over to a cashless society, you wouldn’t need to have an ID card on you twenty-four hours a day. And even if governments made it illegal to leave your home without such a card, people would still be able to choose not to carry one.
“So the next step was to work on people’s fear and insecurities. First of all, they made it mandatory that pets be chipped. That way, people were told, it would be much easier to keep track of lost animals and cheaper to get them registered each year. The next step was to use the media to show how young Johnny or Jane who somehow walked out of their family homes and went missing the week before could have been saved if only the rescuers had found them sooner. Of course, a SID, responding to an outside signal sent by the searchers would have fixed that.
“The next unwitting candidates were people with mental problems, and they were an easy target. People have always been afraid of what they don’t understand, and the notion that mental illness could strike almost anyone was too much for the average person to bear. ‘Will I be next?’ they wondered. It made absolute sense then to chip those people, for their good and that of society. Besides, their numbers were always increasing, although people didn’t seem to understand why. Following them came prisoners on day release and home detention. Then came people who needed help from social security such as pensioners and those on unemployment benefits.
“Soon, legislation was passed requiring that all convicted felons be chipped, and after that, given that so many people were now under the scrutiny of the government and banks, the cry went out that everyone be chipped.
“Not long after that, the bulletin boards on the internet – that was the precursor to the current multimedia system – were filled with bogus cries of ‘It’s every citizen’s right to live in a secure and free society. Demand your chip today.’” [pp. 140-142]


The “people with mental problems” are Alzheimer’s patients ... and their caregivers. It seems to me that VeriChip is preying on the valid concerns—and especially the fears—that accompany caring for someone with Alzheimer’s. And I don’t think it’s an accident that genuine informed consent will be exceedingly hard to get from the individuals themselves, leaving the equally vulnerable family members to make decisions for their afflicted beloved. It isn’t just the galling end-run around proper methodology that toasts me; RFID implants carry serious safety risks, including potential problems with getting an MRI.

Apparently this test is still gearing up, as Caspian has scheduled a protest and prayer vigil for this Saturday, May 12. Y’all know I’m not big on prayer, but a large show of opposition to this kind of testing on individuals would be very good.

uh-oh

life is just one big slippery slope after another, isn't it.

Uh-Oh

I hope you know how to ski.

There are many valid reasons

There are many valid reasons for not accepting or promoting these chips, but a lot of the things mentioned in this article are not necessarily among them.

The only real question is: Do you want someone else - probably government - to be able to track you at all times and have instant access to your personal information? And should they be forced on people who can't object?

I've worn earrings into an MRI with no problems, so something the size of a microchip, in silicon no less, will NOT affect an MRI. I don't know where they get this goofy idea.

As for the other dangers mentioned, they're pretty remote. You are going to be in much greater danger of irritation or infection from a bug bite or a sliver.

The bottom line - and the only real danger - is from government, not the chip itself. Let's not play into the hands of the fear mongers who see monsters under every bed and terrors in ALL technology. sigh... ML

No human being has the right -- under any circumstances -- to initiate force against another human being, nor to threaten or delegate its initiation. The Zero Aggression Principle

Mandatory tomorrow...

"The only real question is: Do you want someone else - probably government - to be able to track you at all times and have instant access to your personal information? And should they be forced on people who can't object?"

Whether it is government or big industry (and sooner or later, you might wonder if there is any real difference), the big issue as you say is having other parties being able to track you wherever you go, and compile a database on your movements, purchase habits & medical history (which again is really about purchase habits).

Privacy? What's that?

Without a great deal of resistance to this technology now, I do imagine that it may only be a matter of time before it becomes compulsory for all people to be chipped...and who will benefit from that?

(Oh, I have no doubt that Sunni agrees with the above, too - but she was right to advise of other problems as well. That's what being an 'informed consumer' is all about...)

Source for MRI risk

Where that “goofy idea” came from is a letter from the FDA to James Santelli of the Digital Angel Corporation, regarding the VeriChip’s approval for use in humans. Scroll down to page 3, paragraph 2.

I don’t like fear-mongers either. I haven’t seen any data on the possibility of problems from having a spychip implanted, nor have I seen any studies that have tried to measure problems with them in MRIs. But I want to know what the risks are, even the remote ones. (Yes, I’m one of those crazy people who read through all of the drug pamphlet that comes with a prescription.)

My stepfather has senile dementia

Before he was bedridden, he used to disappear for hours, occasionally days at a time.

As one of those caregivers, I can say it would have helped us protect him and those around him.

But I wouldn't want the government to have access to or control of the chips.

A few months back, there were those sneakers that transmitted a GPS signal to parents so they could track their kids. I don't think I could support those in most cases.

Maybe it comes down to how much the caregiver can trust their charge and under what circumstances.

But I do not want the government involved in the decision.

Les Damn lies amd Government propoganda

Everything I've discovered about these chips is they will not be encrypted. There will be only an encrypted hash of the data to ensure it has not been tampered with. This make these chips ready made for identity theft. The government claims the chip cannot be read past few centimeters but tests have demonstrated the data be read up to 9 meters (~30 feet) away. http://www.eetimes.com/article/showArticle.jhtml?articleId=45400010

If the government was really concerned with a secure document they would require encryption and mandate a contact readable chip only. That they want a plain text, read at a distance chip is clear evidence that someone wants to use these for surveillance as well.

Agreed.

Yes, that's how I understand the situation, too. In 'Mallcity 14', devices for reading the chips - or 'SIDs' as they are called in the novel - are incorporated into 'Infopanels' and other hardwire found everywhere throughout the city and every home, leading to complete surveillance.