Thank You, Latin American Leaders

Sunni's picture
| |

I haven’t taken a blow to the head and embraced socialism or anything like that. But Evo Morales and Hugo Chávez have earned some thanks from freedom-loving individuals.

The reasons are spelled out in Why the US is losing its war on cocaine. Selected excerpts from the piece (which isn’t too long and is well worth reading for other information that’s tangential to my purpose):

The immensely costly "war on drugs" in Latin America is slowly collapsing like a Zeppelin with a puncture. The long-forecast failure for strategies which involve police and military in forcibly suppressing narcotics ... is now pitifully evident in Bolivia, one of the poorest countries of the Western hemisphere.

The estimated $25bn ... that Washington has spent trying to control narcotics over the past 15 years in Latin America seems to have been wasted. ....

Here, indigent Bolivian President Evo Morales, once a poverty-stricken llama herder and itinerant trumpet player, is resisting pressure from the Bush government to eradicate coca bushes by fire and sword.

The Bolivian leader is no lover of cocaine and his policies are summed up in the slogan "no to drugs, no to cocaine". ....

But he refuses to ban the consumption of coca leaves, which country people regard as gifts from heaven: the indigenous peoples have been chewing them for thousands of years as an aid to survival at 14,000 feet in the perishingly bleak highlands of the Andes which surround this city. ....

[T]he determination of Morales, the leader of a poor country of nine million people, is only a tiny part of Latin America's rejection of the "war on drugs". In a Venezuela enriched by high prices for its oil exports, President Hugo Chavez ... is placing strict controls on his country's co-operation with the US Drug Enforcement Administration (DEA). ....

Now a third Latin American leader, the newly elected President Rafael Correa of Ecuador, has announced that his country will ignore US instructions in the "war on drugs". He has announced that he will no longer allow US forces to occupy a large base at the Pacific port of Manta ...


It is terrific to see them taking a stand against the USSA empire and the hysterical, hypocritical drug war. While it isn’t surprising that Hugo Chávez has taken this stance, I would think it was a rather more complicated decision for Morales and Correa. There’s still a long way to go before this story plays out, but it is encouraging to me that a few individuals somewhere are firmly saying “No” to Bush and Co. I hope they continue to stand firm as the pressure ratchets up, and moreover, that others – abroad as well as within the USSA – start developing the spines these men have. They may go down as a result of this policy shift, but at least they’ll go down knowing they stood up against the world’s biggest bully.

I have a problem with

have earned some thanks from freedom-loving individuals

Especially in light of all the abuses and gross violation of rights by Morales and Chávez (with Correa eagerly trying to catch up).

I do not see the decision as more complicated for Correa and Morales. Chávez is giving away money to all his "friends". They will replace US money with Venezuelan and be popular with the poor (the vast majority in their countries) at the same time. It is almost a no brainer.

Their non cooperation and in some cases outright hostility to the US and to its drug policy are welcome, but in this case at least, the enemy of my enemy is not my friend. Not even my ally.

I am glad they are defying the US and hope they keep it up, but they get no thanks for following their own equally horrible, but different, policy.

Insufficiently careful qualification?

I wrote “some thanks”, which I thought would make it clear that I had a specific focus: their refusal to cooperate with USSA federales in the drug witch-hunts. Nothing else was under consideration.

[I]n this case at least, the enemy of my enemy is not my friend. Not even my ally.


Agreed. Chávez is no friend of liberty, and neither are the others. But I wasn’t speaking in such generalities.

I am glad they are defying the US and hope they keep it up, but they get no thanks for following their own equally horrible, but different, policy.


I am not thankful for probably 99% of what they’re doing, although that estimate has a decent margin of error because I do not keep up with the news in that region as much as I used to. But I do feel grateful for this one thing, and here’s why: it is wearying, disheartening, and sickening to see so many so-called “leaders” defer to this country’s petty tyrants – particularly the current idiot in chief. The drug war took what was an individual choice and private behavior, and created real misery and real victims, in the USSA as well as abroad. And it’s been going on for decades. To see what may be the first signs of real change – again, especially under this idiot’s reign – is very welcome.

Further, perhaps some other rulers will see this brewing rebellion, and start piling on. I’m not saying that I welcome the economic collapse that could result, but Bush has been treated much too deferentially for much too long. Even better, perhaps individuals in those countries will learn of this resistance to the USSA, internalize the concept, and apply it in their own lives ... against their own socialist rulers. I know the odds of that are slim, but they’re higher than the odds of me jockeying the horse that wins the Preakness.

I’m tired of seeing Bush with his butt boys, smirking as if he runs the world. Morales et al. have challenged him; and he really can’t ignore that challenge for several reasons. That’s why I’m thankful; and that’s the only thing I’m thankful for regarding them. No one else need agree with me.

Since you put it that way

I agree.

It will be interesting to see what Bush and Co do in response. One thing that might, and I stress might, occur is that other Latin American countries may follow Chávez down this road. The US, especially the current government, is widely hated in Latin America. Telling the US to go to hell with the war on drugs could be a way to buy some popularity.

To the extent that this could kickoff a good chain reaction, Chávez, Morales and Correa deserve thanks.

One can hope.